Subscribe | E-Editions | River News 75 | Super Shopper - FREE | About Us | Contact Us | FREE Classified Items Under $50
The Northwoods River News | Rhinelander, Wisconsin

Flanders Realty Group

home : opinions : letters to the editor
August 22, 2019

9/23/2017 7:29:00 AM
When is a debate not a debate?

To the Editor:

When is a debate not a debate? This apparent paradox is particularly relevant to discussions of climate change. E.P.A. Administrator Scott Pruitt, for instance, is planning a "debate" about the science of global warming.

But it will not be a real debate. You can't have a debate when the two parties do not accept the same process of establishing truth and do not recognize the same authorities for confirming what is true. If that is the case, you simply have a fruitless exchange of divergent views.

You also don't have a real debate when the purpose is not to establish truth but rather, for ideological purposes, to artificially cast doubt on a well-established truth.

Here's an analogy. What if some politician, who is close friends with the tobacco industry, proposed a "scientific debate" on the issue of whether there is a link between smoking and cancer? If you accept the scientific method and the peer review process, and if you accept the authority of medical science academies, you would know this would be a fake debate. The purpose would be politically motivated to question the well-established scientific truth of a link between smoking and cancer.

Similarly, the reality and danger of human-caused climate change has been established over decades through the most trustworthy process we have: peer-reviewed scientific research. And it is confirmed by our most trustworthy scientific authorities: virtually every relevant scientific academy, nearly 200 around the world.

Scott Pruitt, on the basis of his extreme ideology and for political purposes, does not like what science has demonstrated to be true about climate change. His "debate" will simply be a political stunt to undermine what that process has already established.

For several decades we endured an intentionally deceptive campaign to cast doubt on the medical science about tobacco and cancer, which was given the veneer of respectability by a handful of compliant scientists. Now the "merchants of doubt" are producing a steady stream of pseudo-science about global warming that pundits refer to in order to appear to be scientifically based. I'm sure there will be responses to this letter that will provide fine examples.

There are many things that can and should be debated about climate change, particularly what policies are most effective in minimizing the increasing destructiveness that we are already seeing. But we need to base that discussion on science, not ideology, disinformation, and phony debates.

David Barnhill

Hazelhurst



Reader Comments

Posted: Wednesday, September 27, 2017
Article comment by: David Groh

The period of time of ice on Northern lakes is getting shorter. Walleye populations are declining, although this can be blamed on a number of things I believe that the Walleye's spawning success is a major problem and I believe that spawning success is linked to water temps which are getting warmer. Cardinal are returning to Northern Wisconsin. Who knows if we will get to use our snowmobiles next winter, ten years from now?
I believe the scientist that says carbon in the atmosphere is increasing. I believe the scientist that says that carbon is responsible for warming the planet. I also believe that the carbon and the warming has increased with the industrial revolution.
I just do not understand what there is to not believe. The planet is warming. The years ago predictions of temperature and weather extremes are coming true.


Posted: Monday, September 25, 2017
Article comment by: Patricia DiMartino

Your differentiation between an actual debate and that which Pruitt is proposing is crystal clear, yet people who go the easy route of relying on sound bites and anecdotal "evidence" can't or don't make the distinction.

Keep at it, though. There are very few people who still think the Earth is flat.

Patricia DiMartino




Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, and meet the comment guidelines (see "Comment Guidelines" at right). There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search
search sponsored by



Subscription Login
LOGIN | SUBSCRIBE


Today's Circulars
Print-N-Save Coupons
Order photo reprints

Classifieds
Advertising Information

Community Connections
Submit to Newspaper...

Ced Vig's books for sale
Kris Gilbertson's 'I Recall...'

Twitter
Relay for Life









Life
Facebook | All Things | Wisconsin Lottery | The Lakeland Times - affiliate | Winter Road Conditions | Snow/Trail Conditions


The Northwoods River News | Walker Communications, LLC
232 S. Courtney Street, Rhinelander, WI 54501 | Office (715) 365-6397 | Fax (715) 365-6361

Corporate billing office: The Lakeland Times / Lakeland Printing Inc. | P.O. Box 790, Minocqua, WI 54548 | (715) 356-5236 | Fax (715) 358-2121
Members of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association, Wisconsin Community Papers, Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce, Minocqua Area Chamber of Commerce

Site Design and Content | Copyright 2019 1up!

Software © 1998-2019 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved