Subscribe | E-Editions | River News 75Ę | Super Shopper - FREE | About Us | Contact Us | FREE Classified Ė Items Under $50
The Northwoods River News | Rhinelander, Wisconsin

Flanders Realty Group

home : news : county/state news
April 6, 2020

3/24/2020 7:29:00 AM
Oneida County becomes Second Amendment sanctuary county
Resolution fueled by Evers's anti-gun rights rhetoric
Richard Moore
Investigative Reporter

Oneida County is now a Second Amendment sanctuary county after county supervisors voted 16-1 last week to approve the designation, with three supervisors absent and one seat vacant.

Alone among his colleagues, supervisor Alan VanRaalte cast the lone vote against the resolution declaring support for Second Amendment rights. Along the away, a few attempts were made to modify or postpone the resolution, but ultimately those failed and the resolution cruised to victory.

The resolution puts the county on record as recognizing and reaffirming supervisors' sworn oaths to uphold the U.S. constitution and the Wisconsin constitution, and it urged the governor and Legislature to do likewise.

As such, the resolution states, Oneida County opposes any executive or legislative action that would abrogate, diminish, or in any way infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of the citizens of Oneida County, particularly measures that would ban or impose additional regulations on the possession and use of firearms, firearm accessories, magazines, and ammunition.

The resolution also puts Oneida County on record as opposing any executive or legislative action that would implement any firearms confiscation or "buy back" laws, implement any universal background checks or firearms owner ID requirements, or cause the establishment of a punitive tax on the purchase or possession of firearms, firearm accessories, magazines, and ammunition.

In addition, the resolution puts the county on record as opposing any executive or legislative action which would implement any type of "red flag" law that would abrogate, diminish, or in any way infringe upon the legal rights of due process for county citizens.

Perhaps most important, the resolution vows Oneida County will not appropriate any funds for the enforcement of unconstitutional laws, and the county board encourages law enforcement, the district attorney, and circuit court judges to enforce current laws related to Second Amendment rights.

A political statement

Supervisor Mike Timmons authored the resolution. He said at public safety meetings, several people had offered comments that the resolution was a political stunt, but Timmons disagreed.

"I don't believe this is a political stunt," Timmons said. "This is a statement from the people of Oneida County. I've gotten a lot more positive comments than negative. They say this is our constitutional duty to tell our higher-ups, if you will, that we do not want them to infringe upon our Second Amendment rights."

Oneida County's Sheriff's Office captain Terri Hook spoke on behalf of sheriff Grady Hartman, who supported the resolution. She said Hartman felt it was important for elected officials to go on record on the issue so voters would know where they stand.

"He (sheriff Hartman) believes that the resolution is symbolic, not binding, and that it's important because the governor started making comments about gun buy-backs, and that's not really what the governor is talking about, he's talking about gun confiscation," Hook told supervisors. "The sheriff is very pro-Second Amendment and he believes the people are very concerned about this and that they should hear your decision about it."

Timmons also said the resolution was needed now as the COVID-19 pandemic spreads and emergency declarations are made.

"With everything that's going on with the COVID-19, some of our neighboring states have tried to slide in through the emergencies not only the prohibition of selling alcohol but prohibitions of selling ammunition," he said. "I think this timing is absolutely important."

Supervisor Robb Jensen said he had received some calls from people who did not agree with the resolution. Jensen also said he believed such resolutions were appropriate only when there was pending legislation, and there was none he was aware of.

What's more, Jensen said the inclusion of specific measures within the resolution, such as opposing the implementation of universal background checks, were too sweeping.

"I can tell you right now the majority of the people (in my district) support the Second Amendment, but I don't know if I can specifically say that the majority of people (in my district) don't support universal background checks," Jensen said. "There's too much in here."

Jensen said it was a "get you" resolution.

"It's purely political," he said. "If I vote yes, then Robb Jensen doesn't support any type of gun control. If I vote no, then Robb Jensen doesn't support the Second Amendment. Nothing could be further from the truth."

A Jensen motion to postpone the resolution was defeated. In other discussion, supervisor Jack Sorensen supported the resolution.

"This is a political statement, I recognize that," Sorensen said. "... Am I 100% for everything that's said in the resolution? No, but it's here and it's now and I am going to support it all the way."

County board chairman Dave Hintz also said he supported the resolution.

"The sheriff used the word 'symbolic' to describe this, and I think that's appropriate," Hintz said. "We can argue over the words a bit here and there - we can do that all day if you like - but in my opinion it is one of those things that I think we should do. I feel sad that we have to do it in this country, but I feel sad that we have to put police officers in our schools."

Hintz said he wished it wasn't necessary to pass a resolution to support the constitution of the United States, but in this case he said he felt it was appropriate to do so.

Supervisor Ted Cushing, a supporter of the resolution, said he had been stopped by many constituents asking when the county was going to address the issue and asking why it was taking the county so long to do so.

"I will admit that I have had two phone calls and an email in the last three days to say no to this, but the majority of the people I represent are totally in favor of this," Cushing said. "We get more junk thrown at us out of Madison than you can shake a stick at, and this is a statement that says, 'C'mon guys wake up.' We have a right to tell them that."

Supervisors Bob Mott, Greg Oettinger, and Lance Krolczyk were absent. Former supervisor Bob Metropulos resigned from the county board because he moved out of the district.

Richard Moore is the author of the forthcoming "Storyfinding: From the Journey to the Story" and can be reached at

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, and meet the comment guidelines (see "Comment Guidelines" at right). There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number and email address is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search
search sponsored by

Subscription Login

Today's Circulars
Print-N-Save Coupons
Order photo reprints

Advertising Information

Community Connections
Submit to Newspaper...

Ced Vig's books for sale
Kris Gilbertson's 'I Recall...'


Reader Poll

Which City of Rhinelander elected officials should be recalled?

Please select one:
All of them. The mayor and the entire Common Council.
I would recall the council but keep the mayor.
I would recall the mayor but keep the council.
Everyone but alderman Emmer, as he was just appointed.
Frederickson, Sauer, Holt, Rossing and Larson.
Rog, Kirby and Kelly.

View Results
Reader Poll

Do you support so-called red flag bills which would allow judges to seize people's firearms for up to a year if they pose a threat to themselves or others?

Please select one:
I donít know enough about red flag bills to offer an opinion.
I have no opinion on this question.

View Results
Reader Poll

Which of the follow best describes your intentions regarding voting in the April 7 election?

Please select one:
I plan to vote at my polling place as usual.
Iím voting absentee/in-person absentee
At this point, I donít know whether Iíll vote or not.
I donít intend to vote in this election.

View Results

Facebook | All Things | Wisconsin Lottery | The Lakeland Times - affiliate | Winter Road Conditions | Snow/Trail Conditions

The Northwoods River News | Walker Communications, LLC
232 S. Courtney Street, Rhinelander, WI 54501 | Office (715) 365-6397 | Fax (715) 365-6361

Corporate billing office: The Lakeland Times / Lakeland Printing Inc. | P.O. Box 790, Minocqua, WI 54548 | (715) 356-5236 | Fax (715) 358-2121
Members of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association, Wisconsin Community Papers, Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce, Minocqua Area Chamber of Commerce

Site Design and Content | Copyright 2020 1up!

Software © 1998-2020 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved